User System

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	FUJITSU
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3401-H2
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 196 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 540 56% 452 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.7% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 136 Parallax 125 101% 128 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 128 Splatting 113 95% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 314 380 231 217 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 315 Write 343 Mixed 286 SusWrite 276 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 22.4 78% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 322 242% 323 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 101%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 327 381 371 347 317 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 310 Write 349 Mixed 299 SusWrite 341 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 23.2 80% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 325 245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 101%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L0 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 15TB free Firmware: PCGNT870 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 242 246 257 247 244 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 227 Write 223 Mixed 115 SusWrite 244 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.6 12% 4.63 MB/s	DQ Read 3.4 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 3.6 4% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 32%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TEY 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 15TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 243 251 243 234 237 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 4x16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.7 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	120	21.7"	1280 720	XMD009A Mi TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16