User System

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	FUJITSU
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3401-H2
Memory	57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '23 at 09:15
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 189 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 493 53% 421 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.9% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 133 Parallax 122 97% 125 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 126 Splatting 114 94% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 361GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 359 347 240 241 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 331 Write 375 Mixed 321 SusWrite 288 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 23.1 81% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 316 240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 101%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 360 351 372 373 384 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 326 Write 254 Mixed 321 SusWrite 357 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 23.6 81% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 324 243% 323 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 101%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L0 16TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 15TB free Firmware: PCGNT870 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 250 251 259 255 246 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 214 Write 229 Mixed 109 SusWrite 249 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 1.1 12% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 32%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TEY 16TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 15TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 250 246 250 255 255 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 4x16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.7% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	51	120	21.7"	1280 720	XMD009A Mi TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359