Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 972
93% 768 Pts
64-Core 979
61% 979 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 163
Parallax 151
142% 163 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 132
Splatting 129
122% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 832 826 644 590 737 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 1,569
Mixed 526
SusWrite 725
185% 808 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 39.6
139% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,334
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 1,082
793% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 298%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
428GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1699 1006 610 609 608 609 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,120
Write 1800
Mixed 1,142
SusWrite 857
330% 1,480 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 58
192% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 1,011
783% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 247%
Great: 340%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
208GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1622 2103 2118 2111 2133 2120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,104
Write 1,550
Mixed 1,945
SusWrite 2,035
430% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 57.1
206% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,421
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 913
729% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 320%
Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 443 567 504 374 634 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
202GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 117 115 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 64.4
Write 30.1
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 113
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 33.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 30.5
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 100 35" 1280 720 ACR0579 Z35P
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback