Elo EloPOS E5/S5/H5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemElo EloPOS E5/S5/H5  (all builds)
MotherboardElo Coffeelake Refresh
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 525
59% 464 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3128B-A0 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 72 43 51 45 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 398
Write 163
Mixed 284
SusWrite 60.1
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 28.9
113% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 45
76% 148 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 47 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical EloPOS E5/S5/H5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Elo EloPOS E5/S5/H5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback