Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500TE 12 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 88.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 650 69% 549 Pts	64-Core 646 40% 646 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G 128GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20170000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 182 179 179 172 180 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 830 Write 670 Mixed 618 SusWrite 192 129% 577 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 44.3 194% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 167 135% 191 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 138%
Patriot Memory 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 7GB free, PID 2106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.3 8.2 8 8.4 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.3% Terrible	Read 7.2 Write 6.8 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 8.7 9% 6.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-9500TEIntelBench 76%, 12 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1010 256GBWDCBench 143%, 5 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16