HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EF
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 12:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 179
60% 110 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 429
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9670
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103921
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1018 419 262 141 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 778
Write 1,122
Mixed 854
SusWrite 551
187% 826 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 43.2
145% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 600
442% 580 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 135%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23" 1920 1080 DELD0D6 DELL P2319H
Typical ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback