PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Positivo D610 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Positivo POS-PIB150DT |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180323 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 20 '23 at 02:21 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
65.3%
Good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
40% 308 Pts
|
21% 342 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2032 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
32% 41.6 fps
|
21% 24.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 240GB-$28
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 202 193 28 96 58 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
37% 12.3 MB/s
|
32% 29.6 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate ST91000640NS 1TB
559GB free
Firmware: AA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 91 94 94 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
64% 86.5 MB/s
|
191% 1.27 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston HyperX 3200 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74%
Very good
|
75% 26.4 GB/s
|
64% 22.5 GB/s
|
51% 78.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 20" | 1280 720 | HWP298F HP L200hx |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 9x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 3x |
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 10x |
HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 3%, 14,881 samples | 2x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $70 |