Positivo D610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemPositivo D610  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIB150DT
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 340
40% 308 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2032 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 41.3
32% 41.6 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 42
Splatting 30.3
21% 24.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 202 193 28 96 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 213
Write 93.7
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 124
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 8.7
37% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 57.6
32% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST91000640NS 1TB
559GB free
Firmware: AA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 91 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 90.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 92.7
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3200 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 20" 1280 720 HWP298F HP L200hx
Typical D610 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo D610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback