Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B250M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 336
41% 316 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 75.6
43% 62.5 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 43.6
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CVB-CD128 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 142 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 441
Write 162
Mixed 195
SusWrite 145
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 36.7
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 146
117% 165 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 75 27" 1536 864 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical GA-B250M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback