Gigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P-IN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P-IN  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 12:24
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 39.5
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 10.7
17% 20.6 Pts
4-Core 18.4
8-Core 15.1
2% 16.8 Pts
64-Core 11.7
1% 11.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160316CS 160GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 32 30 30 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 13.4
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 26.9
11% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-001.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.7
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 17 60 15.4" 1280 720 SGT1540 YSD
Typical GA-J1800M-D2P-IN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P-IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback