Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2010-$40 3,290 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 150 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 110F) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.91 0% 1.2 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1 Splatting 3.22 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 66 81 80 30 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 21 Write 50.8 Mixed 11 SusWrite 61.1 26% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5595-001.A00LF 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	94x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	23x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87