Lenovo 20366

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20366  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4A5
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '23 at 14:31
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 88.1
41% 65 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 147
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 3.9
2% 6.7 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 500GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 201 240 248 313 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 359
Write 323
Mixed 311
SusWrite 264
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 21.4
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
718GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 98 100 99 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 69.3
Write 93.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 98.5
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO163D
Typical 20366 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20366

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback