Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 31.1 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 131 45% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 44.4 19% 115 Pts	64-Core 57 4% 57 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 2.1 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Etopso 480GB 480GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0913A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 138 241 307 273 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 340 Write 210 Mixed 222 SusWrite 254 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 13.4 45% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 44 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 33.3 27% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	76x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

RAM
0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GBHB3SU004GFM8MMB33Bench 37%, 45 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 19%, 1,846 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16