Lenovo 10MLCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MLCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 11:19
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 353
49% 361 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.5
4% 6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Dell(1028 C976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 169
Parallax 158
144% 168 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 583 591 559 562 559 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,562
Mixed 1,202
SusWrite 606
286% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 48.2
151% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 619
474% 640 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 183%
Great: 296%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 109 107 108 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 116
Write 100
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 109
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
109GB free
Firmware: AM0P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 87 85 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 70.9
Write 70.4
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 85.6
45% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH M378A1K43CB2-CRC V02D4L84GB5285282400 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 55 215 59 60 18.5" 1280 720 PHLC0AF Philips 196V4
Typical 10MLCTO1WW Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MLCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback