Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 829
78% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 198
Parallax 186
171% 198 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 148
Splatting 132
123% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 51 59 145 148 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 312
Write 140
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 98.6
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 16.1
55% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 76.9
80% 135 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
122GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 1055 1019 989 980 942 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,408
Mixed 1111
SusWrite 1022
277% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.1
189% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 937
716% 977 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 222%
Great: 405%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
218GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 95 97 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 122
Write 133
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 96.9
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 114%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 85 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 156
Write 142
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 86.1
148% 115 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
296% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 106%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 6TB
304GB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 85 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 100
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 85.9
121% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.6
279% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback