CDM GA-F2A85XM-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemCDM GA-F2A85XM-D3H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte F2A85XM-D3H
Memory3.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 08:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 64
2-Core 98.2
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 155
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
AMD(1002 9901) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.1
0% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 37 31 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 57.9
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 33.3
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C 10GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 25 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2695 HP L2045w
Typical GA-F2A85XM-D3H Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: CDM GA-F2A85XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback