Gigabyte H410M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte H410M H  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 183
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 747
70% 581 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 146
131% 103 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 123
Splatting 99.1
110% 141 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-wave(p) 1024G 1TB
412GB free
Firmware: 400fAA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 92 172 93 92 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 935
Mixed 520
SusWrite 118
136% 611 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 37
121% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 468
286% 319 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 319%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 120 134 110 98 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50% Average
Read 434
Write 372
Mixed 314
SusWrite 143
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 14.7
67% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 72
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 34.8
41% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 60%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45% Average
Read 81.1
Write 81
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 75.6
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU49J2320ND 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 10 60 23" 1920 1080 HWP322E HP P232
Typical GA-H410M H Builds (Compare 3,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte H410M H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback