Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43% Average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 85.2 41% 63.6 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 120 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 226C) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.67 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 355GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 105 172 134 111 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 394 Write 328 Mixed 223 SusWrite 143 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 4.3 28% 8.4 MB/s	DQ Read 98.1 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 15.2 22% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 17GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 13 12 12 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 86.7 Write 9.5 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 12.1 30% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-119.A00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.8 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	59x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	34x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	19x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	62x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	49x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	19x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	19x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	18x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	10x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70