Samsung 950XEE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive496% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950XEE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950XEE-XA1BR
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 15:12
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 58.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 276
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 602
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A350M Graphics
Sanyo(144D C872) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1747
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 46.7
29% 38.9 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 45.1
33% 39.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 28 26 48 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
496% Outstanding
Read 5,196
Write 39.3
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 34.3
277% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 712
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 4.5
1,085% 240 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 496%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 47
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 126%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4159
Typical 950XEE Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950XEE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback