Samsung 760XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 760XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP762XDA-XA3US
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime13 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11600H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 702
65% 542 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1A8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 11
7% 28.8 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.5
8% 10 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 1874 1870 1878 1649 1543 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,323
Mixed 1,505
SusWrite 1,696
344% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.7
193% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 850
640% 851 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 264%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE M471A2G44AM0-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760XDA Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 760XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback