Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1260P 4,690 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 59.8 1-Core 177 2-Core 327 97% 188 Pts	4-Core 607 8-Core 930 95% 768 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Arc A350M Graphics 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Sanyo(144D C872) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1747 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 26 17% 26 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 20.4 20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sn530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 894GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21112004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 861 759 835 852 816 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,541 Write 1,446 Mixed 1,244 SusWrite 808 283% 1,260 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 63.6 211% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 656 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 586 412% 529 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3LKCKC@BM-MGCP 8x4GB 524 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	139% Outstanding	MC Read 55.7 MC Write 54.9 MC Mixed 54.7 157% 55.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 38.9 SC Mixed 25.5 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 147%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-1260PIntelBench 85%, 4,690 samples	39x
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 3,751 samples	10x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	44x
Arc A350M GraphicsIntelBench 24%, 3 samples	3x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $449Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	2x

SSD
SDBPNPZ-1T00-1004 1TBSn530Bench 194%, 69 samples	14x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 395 samples	8x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TBSamsungBench 359%, 283 samples	5x

RAM
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 116%, 4,018 samples	30x
K3LKCKC@BM-MGCP 8x4GBSamsungBench 129%, 524 samples	19x