Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 443 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 549 52% 428 Pts	64-Core 837 52% 837 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385 21,427 User benchmarks, average bench 145% Asus(1043 88F8) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 169 Parallax 206 153% 188 fps	MRender 276 Gravity 154 Splatting 116 141% 182 fps
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 157%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 942GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 462 489 547 501 510 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 844 Write 508 Mixed 336 SusWrite 495 121% 546 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 17.4 58% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 253 194% 264 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 446%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 8136 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 52.6 Write 26 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 26.5 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 205% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 4x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 33.2 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	8%	12	211	59	60	27"	1280 720	NEC67DC PA271W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16