Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemSupermicro C7H270-CG-ML  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7H270-CG-ML
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 04:58
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 343
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360
Device(1B0A 90F3) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 12.3
9% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 10
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 1019 1128 1203 1213 1211 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,972
Write 1234
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 1,142
311% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 50.3
170% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 715
542% 730 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 234%
Great: 310%
Toshiba HG6 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 408 433 457 459 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 409
Mixed 426
SusWrite 440
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 36.7
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 345
256% 339 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
582GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 108 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 81.2
Write 64.2
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 100
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 146 148 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 144
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 146
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 23" 1280 720 DELF097 DELL E2318HX
Typical C7H270-CG-ML Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro C7H270-CG-ML

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback