Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateJan 06 '16 at 02:49
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 239
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 698
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 39
36% 42.2 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 35.1
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 498
Write 462
Mixed 461
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 19.1
119% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 17.7
30% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MD03ACA400 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FL1V Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 156
Mixed 152
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 3.08
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
995GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 97.2
75% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.31
115% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 96%
Multi Flash Reader 16GB
14GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 11
Mixed 11.9
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4.49
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.49
63% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $693
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback