Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 12:57
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,225
110% 928 Pts
64-Core 2,142
132% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 140
Parallax 98.9
87% 115 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 89
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 1916 1891 1894 1903 1885 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1131
Write 1,909
Mixed 902
SusWrite 1,852
329% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 62.5
215% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 1,071
779% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 269%
Great: 307%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$48
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00B80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 194 199 199 189 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 172
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 193
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
260% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MD03ACA400 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: FL1V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 103 103 88 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 96
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 98.5
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 91%
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 4TB
348GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 80 82 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 86.4
Write 90.4
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 80.2
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 25.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 28.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 9R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 16% 112 318 228 60 0" 1920 1080 BNQ9C02 BenQ PJ
History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 14: 2R 1G 1B | Score 35: 2R 4G 13B | Score 64: 9R 5G 4B
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback