MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive614% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E07
MotherboardMSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 70.1
1-Core 226
2-Core 444
125% 247 Pts
4-Core 887
8-Core 1240
134% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Device(7377 130A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 297
Parallax 328
256% 313 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 263
Splatting 191
212% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S770 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.W.J.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4119 4701 4453 5142 5144 5142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
614% Outstanding
Read 2,832
Write 5,216
Mixed 2,906
SusWrite 4,783
895% 3,934 MB/s
4K Read 79.6
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 112
410% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,164
DQ Write 1,588
DQ Mixed 1,793
1,362% 1,848 MB/s
Poor: 257%
This bench: 614%
Great: 629%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3660 3863 3865 3872 3870 3876 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
518% Outstanding
Read 2174
Write 3,520
Mixed 2,221
SusWrite 3,834
668% 2,937 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 92.6
343% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 2,329
DQ Write 1,830
DQ Mixed 2,059
1,546% 2,073 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 518%
Great: 502%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3899 4005 4172 5050 4596 3568 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
580% Outstanding
Read 2,968
Write 1,883
Mixed 3,281
SusWrite 4,215
698% 3,087 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 113
351% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 2,406
DQ Write 1,808
DQ Mixed 2,043
1,545% 2,086 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 580%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3228 3228 3233 3232 3223 3228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
521% Outstanding
Read 2,846
Write 3,234
Mixed 2,968
SusWrite 3,229
694% 3,069 MB/s
4K Read 76.9
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 115
381% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,352
DQ Write 1,754
DQ Mixed 1,982
1,501% 2,029 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 521%
Great: 526%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 222 225 222 223 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 202 202 205 209 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
13TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 259 262 241 234 232 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELA146 Dell AW2720HF
Typical PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07) Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback