MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive606% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E07
MotherboardMSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 13:33
Run Duration470 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 226
2-Core 443
125% 246 Pts
4-Core 887
8-Core 1,404
141% 1,146 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 118%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Device(7377 130A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 300
Parallax 353
254% 322 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 261
Splatting 188
211% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S770 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.W.J.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4600 4840 4953 5168 5181 5180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
606% Outstanding
Read 2,474
Write 5,068
Mixed 2,806
SusWrite 4,987
874% 3,834 MB/s
4K Read 78.3
4K Write 275
4K Mixed 100
393% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,170
DQ Write 1,591
DQ Mixed 1,815
1,374% 1,859 MB/s
Poor: 257%
This bench: 606%
Great: 629%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3669 3891 3892 3895 3886 3894 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
504% Outstanding
Read 1,872
Write 3,056
Mixed 2,107
SusWrite 3,855
620% 2,722 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 283
4K Mixed 90.5
336% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 2,371
DQ Write 1,707
DQ Mixed 2,064
1,535% 2,047 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 504%
Great: 502%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4042 4059 3727 3799 4086 3666 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
563% Outstanding
Read 3,029
Write 3,703
Mixed 3,375
SusWrite 3,896
793% 3,501 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 107
364% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,376
DQ Write 1,723
DQ Mixed 1,611
1,322% 1,903 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 563%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3252 3236 3256 3250 3250 3240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 3,124
Mixed 2,908
SusWrite 3,247
676% 2,986 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 114
371% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 2347
DQ Write 1,722
DQ Mixed 1,952
1,481% 2,007 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 511%
Great: 526%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 227 225 224 225 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 213 218 208 212 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
13TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 257 261 243 245 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELA146 Dell AW2720HF
Typical PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07) Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback