MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 243%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive618% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E07
MotherboardMSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration470 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$314
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 69.5
1-Core 226
2-Core 443
124% 246 Pts
4-Core 888
8-Core 1,520
146% 1,204 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 118%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Device(7377 130A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 298
Parallax 331
257% 315 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 261
Splatting 191
212% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S770 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.W.J.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4091 4688 4872 5155 5124 5145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
618% Outstanding
Read 2,728
Write 5,241
Mixed 2,911
SusWrite 4,846
895% 3,931 MB/s
4K Read 79.5
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 120
419% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,163
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,803
1,368% 1,853 MB/s
Poor: 257%
This bench: 618%
Great: 629%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3611 3881 3874 3876 3865 3873 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
523% Outstanding
Read 2,176
Write 3,529
Mixed 2,128
SusWrite 3830
663% 2,916 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 92.6
357% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 2,354
DQ Write 1,868
DQ Mixed 2,078
1,564% 2,100 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 523%
Great: 502%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3950 3432 3642 3886 3656 4056 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
560% Outstanding
Read 3,134
Write 4,622
Mixed 3,330
SusWrite 3,770
842% 3,714 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 112
358% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 2,427
DQ Write 1,763
DQ Mixed 1,743
1,398% 1,978 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 560%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3229 3231 3228 3229 3228 3228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
515% Outstanding
Read 2,726
Write 3,233
Mixed 2,951
SusWrite 3,229
687% 3,034 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 114
379% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 2,353
DQ Write 1,749
DQ Mixed 1982
1,500% 2,028 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 515%
Great: 526%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 227 229 234 230 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 182 179 173 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
13TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 260 261 242 234 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 50 27" 1280 720 DELA146 Dell AW2720HF
Typical PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07) Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z790-A WIFI (MS-7E07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback