HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8997
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 19:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 446
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8997) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 18.6
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 13
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 899 1024 997 654 680 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 878
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 842
222% 988 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 53.1
166% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 483
354% 473 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 173%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5711-009.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 26 48 14 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN142C
Typical 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback