Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 15:46
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 491
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 63.6
52% 66.3 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 56.1
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 421 345 400 413 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 449
Mixed 369
SusWrite 395
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 40
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 347
265% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
209GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 294 267 289 292 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 477
Mixed 399
SusWrite 298
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 50.1
165% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 346
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
209GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 224 204 217 220 225 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 460
Mixed 322
SusWrite 239
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 41.5
147% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 339
262% 357 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
512GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 100 104 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 115
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 105
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 54.6" 1280 720 SAM0F39 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback