Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130409
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 65.1 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 128 52% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 193 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 97.3 Reflection 95.4 Parallax 81.6 79% 91.4 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 90.3 Splatting 76.8 71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R024G SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 12 54 67 20 19 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.1% Very poor	Read 203 Write 185 Mixed 174 SusWrite 36.1 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.2 33% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 411GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 122 124 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 117 Write 112 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 121 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 8G1600CL11 2x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.3% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	18.4"	1280 720	GSM4BAE W1943

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	26x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	24x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	12x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
Z1 SSD 240GBMaxtorBench 70%, 1,683 samples	4x
S400 120GBKingdianBench 66%, 1,721 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	6x
Shunlie.16G Shunlie.16G 32GBUnknownBench 22%, 6 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,425 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $226

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16