Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive5.26% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 22:32
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 116
48% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 176
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 86.1
80% 92.8 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 90.1
Splatting 76
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R024G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 27 26 22 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.26% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 53
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 27.5
7% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 19.6
DQ Mixed 5.8
8% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
411GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 110 122 121 121 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 121
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8G1600CL11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 60 18.4" 1280 720 GSM4BAE W1943
Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback