Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 73.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 261 85% 157 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 819 81% 661 Pts	64-Core 980 61% 980 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293 48,534 User benchmarks, average bench 122% Asus(1043 8903) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 118 Parallax 172 137% 153 fps	MRender 193 Gravity 130 Splatting 105 113% 143 fps
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 313 334 388 387 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 438 Write 400 Mixed 440 SusWrite 350 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 39.7 140% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 118 101% 151 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 137%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 68GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 526 590 573 47 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,208 Write 904 Mixed 791 SusWrite 380 183% 821 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 51.5 178% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 189 158% 224 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 242%
SABRENT DISK02 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 316 Write 347 Mixed 286 409% 316 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 17.2 1,480% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 21.3 1,694% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 185%
SABRENT DISK01 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 235 213 158 162 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 361 Write 231 Mixed 331 SusWrite 188 362% 278 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 16.5 1,408% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 21.7 1,713% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 212%
SABRENT DISK00 2TB 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 31 33 32 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.7% Very poor	Read 24 Write 29.5 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 31.1 37% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 31% 0.63 MB/s

SABRENT DISK02 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 213GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.3 4.2 4.1 4 4.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.91% Terrible	Read 49.9 Write 24.6 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 4.3 31% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1 44% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 123%
SABRENT DISK00 2TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2TB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 22 16 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 218%
SABRENT DISK03 8TB 598GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.15% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 16.9 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 0.3 16% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s

SABRENT DISK03 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 259GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 106 73 25 28 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	131% Outstanding	Read 348 Write 343 Mixed 320 SusWrite 63.5 350% 269 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 15.8 1,292% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 26.8 DQ Mixed 22.6 1,756% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 168%
SABRENT DISK01 8TB 936GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.25% Terrible	Read 49.9 Write 11.7 Mixed 12.1 SusWrite 0 18% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78% Very good	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 31.9 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 30.4 70% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	21.5"	1920 1080	LEN61B7 E24-10

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $525

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16