Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 813
80% 654 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 117
Parallax 155
136% 146 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 131
Splatting 105
113% 144 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 294 305 302 296 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 248
Write 409
Mixed 438
SusWrite 297
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 40.1
134% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 191
140% 184 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 137%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
68GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 158 439 448 434 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 901
Mixed 593
SusWrite 361
180% 815 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 61.3
166% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 193
175% 261 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 145%
Great: 242%
SABRENT DISK02 2TB
3GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 366
Write 347
Mixed 359
459% 357 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 20.3
1,533% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 21.2
1,623% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 185%
SABRENT DISK00 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 33 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
Read 52.6
Write 35.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 33.1
50% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 7.1
607% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 12.8
1,086% 13.7 MB/s
SABRENT DISK00 2TB
2TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 30 31 31 31 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 218%
SABRENT DISK03 4TB
259GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 284 298 299 297 275 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
166% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 368
Mixed 304
SusWrite 271
441% 328 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 12.4
1,032% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 20.7
1,655% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 166%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 32.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 30.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 21.5" 1920 1080 LEN61B7 E24-10
Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback