Performance Results

Gaming 109%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 117%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B05
MotherboardMSI X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '23 at 01:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 896
80% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 2484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 196
Parallax 169
153% 184 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 133
Splatting 127
120% 150 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 134%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-500GM 500GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1842 1719 860 830 840 834 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,595
Mixed 994
SusWrite 1,154
283% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 72.9
250% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 702
532% 721 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 231%
Great: 384%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
917GB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 107 106 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 165
Write 180
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 108
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.7
277% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 21.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 48.8" 4096 1152 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05) Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $864
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback