Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 239
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 703
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 194
Parallax 202
143% 190 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 183
Splatting 129
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 647 656 641 651 650 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 2,215
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 695
385% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 68.4
224% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 887
640% 833 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 246%
Great: 340%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 42B9T6TB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 1184 1155 1124 1093 1126 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,577
Write 1,914
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 1,223
415% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 74.4
242% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 665
582% 870 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 296%
Great: 370%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
471GB free
Firmware: 42BEU1TB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 549 555 554 559 563 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,571
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,755
SusWrite 680
389% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 74.4
239% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 676
575% 844 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 260%
Great: 372%
WD Elements 2TB
581GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 30.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 21.3
41% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 44%
WDC WD25 00KS-00MJB0 250GB
171GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 34.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 20.5
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 34.3
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 34" 1280 720 DELD12C DELL S3422DWG
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback