MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 04:59
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
78% 147 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 1,015
89% 758 Pts
64-Core 2,555
158% 2,555 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 188
Parallax 177
137% 178 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 178
Splatting 126
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1834 1831 1862 1861 1753 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 1,917
Mixed 912
SusWrite 1,768
391% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.5
208% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 851
642% 864 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 307%
Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
597GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 125 120 124 126 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 69.2
Write 110
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 117
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
872GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 120 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 69.8
Write 128
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 118
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 49.3
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback