Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 210
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 544
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 1653) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.5% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 80.6
61% 84.3 fps
MRender 86.7
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 81.9
68% 82.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 603 564 533 530 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,290
Write 1,559
Mixed 1,336
SusWrite 625
271% 1,202 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 59.6
188% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 598
449% 600 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 175%
Great: 372%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
80GB free
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 838 770 711 559 538 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 790
Write 1,280
Mixed 831
SusWrite 715
205% 904 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 29.4
126% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 630
477% 644 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 142%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD Kingston CBD26D4S9D8ME-16 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 144 15.5" 1920 1080 AUO82ED
Typical GA-AERO 15XV8 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback