HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 00:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 33.7
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 50.9
24% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 58.6
8-Core 62.6
8% 60.6 Pts
64-Core 59.6
4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 1850) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 70 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 41.3
Write 69.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 75.2
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
E 8GB
667, 667, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.1
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 5 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback