AZW GTR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAZW GTR  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GTR
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 289
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 721
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1F66 0001) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.44.05
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 48.4
Parallax 60.1
26% 46.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 36
Splatting 45.9
30% 35.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1505 1681 1631 1816 1823 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,280
Write 1,420
Mixed 1,450
SusWrite 1,663
329% 1,453 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 61.8
266% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 966
746% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 280%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 40.8
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 22.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 115%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 0 61.3" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical GTR Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW GTR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback