AZW SEi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230619
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 15:36
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Memory 10.8
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 16.2
10% 15.5 Pts
4-Core 44.2
8-Core 50
6% 47.1 Pts
64-Core 61
4% 61 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 350 337 455 360 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 437
Write 352
Mixed 319
SusWrite 372
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 34.9
86% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 84.3
62% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 315%
Seagate Portable 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 131 128 130 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 126
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 395
10% 395 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 4 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical SEi Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback