Today's hottest deals

Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 23:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 185
2-Core 359
108% 206 Pts
4-Core 734
8-Core 1,421
128% 1,078 Pts
64-Core 1,739
108% 1,739 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 92.6
52% 59.7 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 79
Splatting 94.6
58% 66.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 1631 86 72 1371 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 2,414
Mixed 1,810
SusWrite 605
362% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.9
225% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 1,259
824% 986 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 208%
Great: 516%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 56.9
MC Mixed 48.6
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 51.2
SC Write 65.8
SC Mixed 50.8
160% 55.9 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 150%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 23.8" 1280 720 LEN65FB LEN L24q-30
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback