HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 829D
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 194 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 316 41% 307 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E344) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 35.4 20% 29.8 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 27 Splatting 26.2 22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR061 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 314 77 166 85 72 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 412 Write 346 Mixed 342 SusWrite 173 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 12 73% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 22.7 68% 141 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 81%
ST500LT0 12-9WS142 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 195GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 72 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 75.5 Write 77.3 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 73.3 91% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 7,811 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	66% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 20.1 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 17.3 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	20	11	85	17.6"	1280 720	VSC4907 G90fb-2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 MT Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	171x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	105x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	91x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	143x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	93x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	49x

SSD
P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $69Bench 256%, 17,082 samples	36x
Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSabrent $30Bench 152%, 11,181 samples	13x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	9x

RAM
- [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 24GBUnknownBench 73%, 68 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	26x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16