ECS A320AM4-M3

Performance Results

Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop 76%
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardECS A320AM4-M3  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 197
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 665
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 69.7
54% 67.7 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 62.5
54% 66 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 122 66 72 69 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 462
Write 366
Mixed 304
SusWrite 99.6
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 11
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 17.2
47% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
874GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 177 180 186 185 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 120
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 183
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 24.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 75 22" 1280 720 NYC0000 B225H
Typical A320AM4-M3 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A320AM4-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback