Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 263%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics299% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive486% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,080
95% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,907
118% 1,907 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
299% Outstanding
Lighting 413
Reflection 546
Parallax 777
336% 579 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 586
Splatting 307
371% 473 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 299%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2954 3008 3325 3706 3657 1207 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
486% Outstanding
Read 4,139
Write 3,743
Mixed 2,606
SusWrite 2,976
755% 3,366 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 64.9
266% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,477
DQ Write 1,152
DQ Mixed 1,310
981% 1,313 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 486%
Great: 633%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 32A0T54A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1082 1400 1287 1360 1381 1403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1377
Mixed 1175
SusWrite 1,319
332% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 85.7
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 510
532% 883 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 300%
Great: 372%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 181 173 177 181 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 172
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 177
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 33.8
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 33.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback