Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 385%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 432%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics375% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive481% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 12:25
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 174
2-Core 342
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,310
119% 1,000 Pts
64-Core 2,272
141% 2,272 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
375% Outstanding
Lighting 590
Reflection 586
Parallax 804
481% 660 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 573
Splatting 300
368% 471 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 375%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2396 2611 3007 3213 3166 3100 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
481% Outstanding
Read 3,650
Write 3,319
Mixed 2344
SusWrite 2,916
687% 3,057 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 66.7
275% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,864
DQ Write 1,488
DQ Mixed 1639
1,237% 1,664 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 481%
Great: 633%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 32A0T54A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 1215 1189 1224 1147 1223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 1,197
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 1,182
286% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 71.7
254% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,278
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 510
537% 895 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 267%
Great: 372%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 178 181 171 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 162
Mixed 86
SusWrite 176
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 46.5
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 43.2
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback