Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 383%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 426%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics373% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 23:41
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 174
2-Core 351
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,317
119% 999 Pts
64-Core 2,179
135% 2,179 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
373% Outstanding
Lighting 579
Reflection 595
Parallax 837
472% 670 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 590
Splatting 318
378% 482 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 373%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
628GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2166 2724 2921 3320 1895 478 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 3,836
Write 3,449
Mixed 2,375
SusWrite 2,250
667% 2,978 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 70.5
271% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,922
DQ Write 1,578
DQ Mixed 1,674
1,274% 1,725 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 451%
Great: 633%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 32A0T54A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1225 1243 1231 1233 1234 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,040
Write 1,377
Mixed 876
SusWrite 1,204
306% 1,374 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 76.4
256% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1280
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 510
536% 894 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 283%
Great: 372%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 179 176 177 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 165
Mixed 76
SusWrite 176
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 46.8
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 43.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback