Asrock H61M-VS.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS.  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '17 at 07:06
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 141
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 204
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Sapphire(174B E198) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 3.91
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.04
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 109
Mixed 106
75% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.28
74% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Virtual Disk 790GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Read 9.92
Write 10.6
Mixed 10.3
8% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 4.21
4K Mixed 1.77
293% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 34%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB
3GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.8
Write 4.89
Mixed 8.2
11% 11 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron N0 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback