Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 297
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2563 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 138
Parallax 127
104% 131 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 139
Splatting 116
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 162 105 112 95 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 225
Write 324
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 97.6
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 11.5
47% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 37.9
77% 152 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 102%
Samsung CM871a M.2 2280 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: MAT22D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 209 212 217 225 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 408
Write 379
Mixed 306
SusWrite 227
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 26.5
90% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 285
210% 274 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HUA5C3030ALA640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: ME0KR5A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 105 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 106
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 66%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 128 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 129
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 2G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 41% 34 186 26 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS2401 VG249Q1R
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback