Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime41 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 173
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 287
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 122
Parallax 114
99% 119 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
90% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 97 29 165 91 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 210
Write 315
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 95.5
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 10.3
48% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.3
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 39.1
75% 142 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung CM871a M.2 2280 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: MAT22D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 202 213 221 224 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 379
Write 348
Mixed 264
SusWrite 222
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 22.9
78% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 278
205% 267 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HUA5C3030ALA640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: ME0KR5A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 101 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 99.1
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 66%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 128
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 4R 7G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 47% 47 172 22 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS2401 VG249Q1R
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $242
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback