MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 221%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A54
MotherboardMSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 826
84% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Lighting 360
Reflection 290
Parallax 367
293% 339 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 252
Splatting 180
207% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 231%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 963 684 674 664 671 643 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 2283
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 716
402% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 82.1
271% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 900
658% 865 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 266%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
198GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 489 489 489 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 442
SusWrite 488
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.6
208% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
WD Re 3TB (2012)-$55
166GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63% Good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 96.7
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 2BA30010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 69 61 39 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 54.7
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 59%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
55GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 58
Write 55.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 34
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 60.3
MC Mixed 43.8
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 24.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 128%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 2194 1234 ACI27B3 ROG PG27AQ
Typical X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54) Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback